What are the differences between plate-buckle scaffolding, fastener-type steel pipe scaffolding, and bowl-buckle scaffolding? Why is the plate-type scaffolding gradually replacing the fastener-type steel pipe scaffolding and bowl-type scaffolding? Let’s take a look at the differences between bowl-buckle, fastener-type and plate-buckle scaffolding.
1. Types of scaffolding
Bowl-buckle scaffolding: vertical poles and horizontal poles.
Fastener scaffolding: steel pipe, fasteners.
Disk-type scaffolding: vertical poles, horizontal poles, and inclined poles.
2. Force mode
Bowl-buckle scaffolding: axis stress.
Fastener Scaffolding: Friction.
Disk-type scaffolding: the axis is stressed.
3. Material
Bowl-buckle scaffolding: Q235.
Fastener scaffolding: Q235.
Disk type scaffolding: Q345.
4. Node reliability
Bowl-button scaffolding: relatively balanced node performance, strong torsion resistance, and average reliability.
Fastener-type scaffolding: uneven node performance, large performance differences, and low reliability.
Disk-type scaffolding: relatively balanced node performance, strong torsion resistance, and high reliability.
5. Carrying capacity
Bowl-buckle scaffolding: spacing 0.9*0.9*1.2m, allowable load of a single pole (KN) 24.
Fastener type scaffolding: spacing 0.9*0.9*1.5m, allowable load of single pole (KN) 12.
Disk-type scaffolding: spacing 0.9*0.9*1.5m, single pole allowable load (KN) 80.
6. Work efficiency
Bowl-button scaffolding: erection 60-80m³/working day, dismantling 80-100m³/working day.
Fastener-type scaffolding: erection 45-65m³/working day, dismantling 50-75m³/working day.
Disk-type scaffolding: erection 80-160m³/working day, dismantling 100-280m³/working day.
7. Material loss
Bowl-button scaffolding: 5%.
Fastener scaffolding: 10%.
Disk-type scaffolding: 2%.
in conclusion:
Bowl-buckle scaffolding: The node stability is average, the bearing capacity is greatly affected by the nodes, the overall reliability is average, the loss is large, and the work efficiency is low.
Fastener-type scaffolding: The node stability is poor, the bearing capacity is greatly affected by the nodes, the overall reliability is low, the loss is large, and the work efficiency is low.
Disk-type scaffolding: good node stability, load-bearing capacity less affected by nodes, high overall reliability, low loss, and high work efficiency.
Post time: Jan-15-2024